One of the most interesting paradoxes(自相矛盾的话) in America today is that Harvard University, the oldest institution of higher learning in the United States, is now engaged in a serious debate about what a university should be.
“Should Harvard or any other university be an intellectual sanctuary, away from the political and social revolution of the age, or should it be a laboratory for experimentation with these political and social revolutions; or even an engine of the revolution?” This is what is being discussed privately in the faculty of Harvard.
The issue was defined by Waiter Lippmann, a distinguished Harvard graduate, several years ago. “If the universities are to do their work,” he said, “they must be independent and they must be disinterested(廉洁)… They are places to which men can turn for judgments which are unbiased(无偏见的) by partisanship(政党支持)and special interest. Obviously, the moment the universities fall under political control, or under the control of private interests, or the moment they themselves take a hand in politics and the leadership of government, their value as independent and disinterested sources of judgments is damaged.”
This is part of the argument that is going on at Harvard today. Another part is the argument of the militant(好战的) : that a university is the keeper of our ideals and morals, and should not be “disinterested” but activist in bringing the nation’s ideals and actions together.
Harvard’s men of today seem more troubled and less sure about personal, political and academic purpose than they did at the beginning. “They are not even clear about how they should debate and solve their problems, but they are struggling with them privately, and how they come out is certain to influence American university and political life.”
1.The issues in the debate on Harvard’s goals are whether the universities should remain independent of our society and its problems, or whether they should .
A.fight with the militant
B.overcome the widespread dependency
C.take an active part in solving society’s ills
D.support our old and established institutions
2.In regard to their goals and purposes in life, the author believes that Harvard men are becoming .
A.more sure about them
B.less sure about them
C.more hopeful of reaching a satisfactory answer
D.completely disappointed about ever
3.The word “sanctuary”in paragraph 3 is .
A.a holy place devoted to a certain god
B.a temple of middle age
C.a certain place you can hide in and avoid something
D.a place to train soldiers
4.In the author’s judgment, the debate going on at Harvard .
A.is a sad symbol of our general puzzlement
B.will soon be over, because times are bound to change
C.is of interest mostly to Harvard men and their friends
D.will influence future life in America
CBCD
A. Profits enlarging B. Technology developing C. Education investing D. Benefits transferring E. Dominance disappearing F. A nation rising |
The following is an imaginary diary entry written by US president. This diary is part of Global Trends 2025, which was written by the US National Intelligence Council
80
The
81
The
82
Global wealth and economic power will shift from West to East.
83
84
The transition from old fuels to new will be slow, as will the development of new technologies that present feasible alternatives to fossil fuels or help eliminate food and water problems. All current technologies are inadequate, and new ones will probably not be commercially possible by 2025